Readers Want More Barriers, Tell Us Why CX Rules

Pin It

Our last poll was decisive – the vast majority of you don’t think the UCI and USA Cycling rules are for the better of the sport, and over half of you would first reject the limitations on the # of barriers that are allowed on a course. Power to the promoters, and ultimately, the racer to decide what makes a good course and is most fun?

We’ve got a new poll up and it’s a simple one. Tell us what you like best about ‘cross. Go to it – express your opinion and vote in the upper right of our site.

 

 

Cyclocross Magazine, Issue 22, Print and digital subscriptionsHave you subscribed yet? You're missing out if not. Get all-original content and your cyclocross fix throughout the year with a subscription and Issue 23 back copy, with features on Lars van der Haar, Jonathan Page, Elle Anderson and more!
Tagged as:
1 comments
Richard McClung
Richard McClung

I think it should be pointed out that UCI rules allow for 6 obsticles forcing a dismount in a course, it's just that only one of them may be a set of 2 plank barriers. I'm not so sure most people realize this.

If people want to jump over a lot of stuff and run, you can lay down a row of logs, or deep sand pits, or whatever, and still be within the rules.

If anyone thinks a fully compliant UCI course means it's 'wimpy', I know there are plenty of UCI courses in Europe, and here in the US, that would have most people crying in a couple of laps.

Stay up to date:

Search for a product, review, race or racer:

Visit these cx-loving companies:





Support CXM at no extra cost to you: