Advertisement

At Eurobike 2015, SRAM unveiled its long-awaited electronic wireless drivetrain, named SRAM RED eTAP. At Interbike 2015, Cyclocross Magazine had one of the first rides on the new drivetrain. While the first test was on a Focus road bike equipped with road tires, you can be sure of one thing: I was evaluating the SRAM RED eTAP componentry on their cyclocross and gravel-worthiness. Maybe you've read a few words already about the group on road-oriented websites, but we sought to bring a cyclocross and gravel-dirtied lens to view the new electronic and wireless group.

The SRAM RED eTAP electronic / wireless drivetrain shares the same type of battery with the front derailleur, and controls all the pairing. Short cage only, max 28t for now. © Cyclocross Magazine The SRAM RED eTAP electronic / wireless drivetrain shares the same type of battery with the front derailleur, and controls all the pairing. Short cage only, max 28t for now. © Cyclocross Magazine

SRAM has its cyclocross-oriented Force 1 (formerly CX1) component group, and nearly all of its sponsored cyclocross athletes will remain on Force 1 this season, with a few notable exceptions, such as Wout van Aert riding with SRAM RED 22 mechanical at CrossVegas. But you can be sure that enthusiasts building their dream cyclocross or gravel bike, and racers looking to try the latest and greatest, will be anxious to test the new electronic group in the harsh elements of cyclocross and gravel riding. As CXM's resident senior bike geek, I certainly fall into that group.

On paper, SRAM's accomplishments are impressive, and there are a few attributes that separate it from Di2 and Campagnolo. The SRAM RED eTAP wireless system makes installation easy, quick and clean, eliminating battery or wiring placement concerns. Also, in typical SRAM fashion, the system also gives a nod to weight weenies, with a negligible weight gain over its already lightest-in-class RED 22 mechanical groupset (when you consider the weight of cables and housing with the mechanical system). It's also more than half a pound lighter than Di2 for a full component group. See the table in our slideshow for full SRAM RED eTAP component weights.

3 of 13
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

Shifting speed feels comparable to Shimano Di2, in that it’s not blazing fast but it’s precise. Certain mechanical shifters, like ErgoPower on upshifts or STI on downshifts, might be able to force the chain across multiple cogs faster, but with electronic shifting in general, and eTAP in particular, you’ll get where you want to go 100% of the time in the fastest-error free way. The servo-controlled derailleurs master the ability to overshift a bit to make sure the chain gets to the right cog or chainring, and then adjusts to the appropriate (and quietest) position.

What I was most impressed with was SRAM eTAP’s memory of what you want to do. You can pretend the eTAP buttons are on a video game controller, and go all Galaga on them. The system catches up. Upshift in the back, tap both shifters to execute a front shift to the big ring, then tap the left shifter six times and it will do everything in perfect order, even if it can’t do it all simultaneously.

And it’s those sequential shifts that represent the one potential downside I see with the system, and a relatively minor one at that. When racing cyclocross on hilly courses, I routinely shift the front derailleur in one direction, while simultaneously shifting the rear derailleur in the opposite direction, simply to reduce the shock to my legs and the percent of change in gearing. Sure, road riders do this as well, but in the multi-lap nature and constant terrain and speed changes of cyclocross, I’ll argue that cyclocross racers need to do this far more in an hour than a road rider or racer. With SRAM eTAP, front and rear shifts need to be in sequence, and so this specific situation gets a bit slower. If we took out the stop watch, we’re probably talking a second or two, but double chainring racers may still miss it on certain courses that require multiple chainring shifts per lap.

But that leads to what I’ll bet is the next iteration of SRAM eTAP: a single chainring option. SRAM dominates the 1X drivetrain market, and it only makes sense that as the electronic and wireless technology trickles down to Force, they’ll continue Force’s single chainring options.

We’re also certain that in the near future we’ll see an eTAP shifter paired with SRAM’s hydraulic HydroR road and disc calipers, to compete against the excellent R785 hydraulic Di2 levers from Shimano that dominate the European cyclocross scene.

What about installation? See the next page for discussion on setting up the new SRAM eTAP components.

3 of 13
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse