Long-Term Review: Look S-Track MTB / Cyclocross Pedals – A Stable, Mud-proof Option

Pin It
A first look at the Look S-Track MTB pedal. © Cyclocross Magazine

A first look at the Look S-Track MTB pedal. © Cyclocross Magazine

by Clifford Lee

Back in 1984, Look popularized the step-in “clipless” pedal, using its long-gained knowledge from dominance in the ski industry, and the cycling world has not been the same since.

However, despite their innovations, Look never gained a strong foothold in the mountain bike scene (unless you consider securing mountain bike legend Tinker Juarez’s shoes to the crank for most of his wins a strong foothold). Mountain bike clipless pedals are an area that was dominated by Shimano as the sport grew in the 1990’s. Look concentrated on the then-strong road bike world.

That’s not to say Look did not try tapping into the off-road market, having no less than six iterations prior to the S-Track, each requiring a different cleat:

  1. the Look ATB, a 1985 version of the road clipless pedal with a grippy backside
  2. the MP90/TP93m a more aggressive version of the ATB
  3. a Shimano-like dual-sided pedal compatible with two-bolt “SPD” style cleats with a large platform (the S2R Moab and S2 Nevada models)
  4. the slimmer elastomer-based SL3 dual-sided pedal
  5. a licensed Crank Brothers “Eggbeater” design 4×4 pedal
  6. the light and mud-clearing Quartz.

The Quartz was the off-road pedal most unique to Look, but had a misstep with the initial released “version one” that had early-release problems (no pun intended). “Version two” addressed this and became my favorite because it was inexpensive, lightweight and mud-clearing, all with an easy in-and-out design. We reviewed this pedal twice—first in Issue 7 just after the new version was released and recently in Issue 17, just as the pedal was about to be discontinued when the new Look S-Track debuted.

And so that brings us to new S-Track pedal, which has a two-bail cleat attachment similar to the Quartz it replaces, though the cleats are not compatible. Similar to the Quartz, the bails are the retention springs, though they are thicker than the Quartz.

Look S-Track mtb / cyclocross pedal offers serious mud clearance and stability. © Cyclocross Magazine

Look S-Track MTB/cyclocross pedal offers serious mud clearance and stability. © Cyclocross Magazine

The S-Track is available in three versions:

  • $369 Titanium axle with carbon reinforced body with carbon reinforced deflectors (244g)
  • $209 Chrome-Molybdenum (Cromoly) steel axle with composite body and aluminum deflectors (290g)
  • $109 Base model (tested): Cromoly steel axle with composite deflectors (284g)

The deflectors serve to flip the pedal onto one of its two sides for cleat engagement, similar to the age-old Lyotard Berthet M23 pedals from the 1970’s for those old enough to remember.

Next Page >>

 

 

Cyclocross Magazine, Issue 22, Print and digital subscriptionsHave you subscribed yet? You're missing out if not. Get all-original content and your cyclocross fix throughout the year with a subscription and Issue 23 back copy, with features on Lars van der Haar, Jonathan Page, Elle Anderson and more!
Tagged as: , , ,
16 comments
lineark
lineark

can i use this for a road bike? 

Smith Mann
Smith Mann

An upgrade over ATAC- read the review!

Brandon Rothauge
Brandon Rothauge

Much easier to engage than the ATAC, and they shed mud, sand and grass more efficiently.

craigmacintyre
craigmacintyre

I have two questions.  First, how much release angle - I assume they have some float just by the design.  Second, you infer that the cleat pedal interface is strictly between the cleat and the pedal with the shoe essentially taken out of the equation - is that right?  If so these may just become a bike fitters dream pedal (for shimming and wedging!)

Sean Wittmer
Sean Wittmer

It might just be me but the retention system looks very TIME like.

repsteindds
repsteindds

Uh yeah, okay. Time, the other French company got it right a long time ago. I will stick with my ATAC's which have changed very little in my 20 years on them.

ChrisFallon
ChrisFallon

Overall an excellent review of the pedals. I wondered with the one caveat being ease of entry why you did not mention the easy cleat vs. the comp cleat choice the pedals come with? 

Pablo Thai
Pablo Thai

I love them.. They have more platform support then the egg beater from crank brother..but both are great pedals.

SmithMann
SmithMann

@craigmacintyre I checked the release angle and find it closely matches the advertised of 15 degrees.  We rode the S-Track with the standard included cleats without the optionally available composite cages, so indeed your statement is true.  The shoe treads never contact the pedal, the interface is cleat to pedal only.  With the cages, that will likely change.  I've spoken to a pro bike fitter local to me about this and he began using the S-Track as his recommended mtb pedal soon after it came out  for this very reason.

SmithMann
SmithMann

@ChrisFallon Thanks for the comment. You're a well-informed reader and while we were doing this long-term review, we didn't even notice the new cleat was released this summer. I'll be putting the Easy Cleat option for a run (literally) in the next couple of weeks and will add to the review with an update.  

Stay up to date:

Search for a product, review, race or racer:

Visit these cx-loving companies:





Become a CXM Supporter:

Like the content on cxmagazine.com? We're just a tiny two full-time person operation with big aspirations. Help us continue to bring you awesome cx content: Become a CXM supporter today:

Polls

What do you do in the off-season?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Support CXM at no extra cost to you: