Long-Term Review: Look S-Track MTB / Cyclocross Pedals – A Stable, Mud-proof Option

Pin It

Another feature new to the S-Track is what Look calls DCS (dynamic cleat system): Mud is evacuated from the cleat via cutouts on the cleat itself. With all the cleat sculpting, it leaves thin blade-like areas of the cleat that left us wondering about durability, though that hasn’t been an issue in six months of moderate use.

The Quartz relied on shimming the cleat with included wedges so that the shoe’s tread contacted the pedal body, and if setup correctly, it had one of the most solid, rock-free interfaces. Shimano relies on the cleat interface for loose stability and if the shoe tread contacts the pedal body, that enhances the stability. With the Time and Crank Brothers two-bail engagement system, the shoe rests on the bails themselves, often resulting in a rocky relationship and a dented sole. Crank Brothers sells metal shoe shields to combat this problem.

With the S-Track, dependence on shoe’s tread for stability is eliminated since the broad cleat rests on the stainless steel surface of pedal body, cushioned by composite pads on the cleat itself, similar to the Shimano interface, but broader and without the potential metal-to-metal squeaking. The consequence of the wide cleat is potential interference with shoe treads with pedal exit or mud build-up.

There are four different cleat spacers, but you may not need them. Look S-Track mtb / cyclocross pedal reviewed. © Cyclocross Magazine

There are four different cleat spacers, but you may not need them. Look S-Track MTB / cyclocross pedal reviewed. © Cyclocross Magazine

Outer areas of the pedal body are designed to interface with the shoe’s tread and sit lower than the cleat interface surface, but I was never actually able to get the shoe’s tread to contact the pedal body for support. Although the cleat comes with the four different width pads, I didn’t need to use any of them on my Specialized S-Works shoe. The shoe’s tread would have to be very tall in order to contact these areas and I could not find a shoe with such tall treads. Without any pads, I could still get in and out of the pedal without problem, and didn’t find mud clearance to be an issue with the cleat as close to the sole as possible. Regardless, the shoe was still completely stable when engaged—more than any other pedal I’ve used except perhaps the Quartz that it replaces.

Engagement is firm and positive, but requires considerable force with the included Comp DCS cleats compared to the Quartz or a Shimano SPD set to moderate spring tension. The engagement/release tension is not adjustable, but will ease slightly as the cleat wears a bit and the pedal breaks in. I wondered how fast the rubber pads on the cleat would wear and how that will change the firm interface I’ve enjoyed, but I haven’t experienced any significant change so far.

Though flipping the pedal and finding the engagement points is easy and intuitive, actually clipping in is sometimes challenging because of the step-in force required. Perhaps if I was a heavier rider, this would be less of an issue, but I sometimes have to put conscious effort into clipping in, sometimes repositioning the crank arm to the 6 o’clock position. As I’ve gotten used to engagement, I found that rotating my foot slightly to the release angle helped, as did being in a taller gear. Clipping out has never been an issue. However, I can envision that with two to go, just before that last set of barriers, if you don’t exit with intention and instead are distracted looking for a hand-up, you might find yourself sideways still attached to your bike.

[Update: Look Cycle has released the Easy DCS S-Track cleat as an aftermarket option for easier entry/release for lighter or less-aggressive racers.]

“There is no tension adjustment because it always springs back,” a Look representative explained at Interbike 2013. “Compared to the Quartz, the model before this one, we improved the contact surface between the cleat and the pedal to protect the surface. We added some deflectors, which helps the cleats clip in.”

Thick mud? No problem with entry or release. Look S-Track mtb / cyclocross pedal reviewed. © Cyclocross Magazine

Thick mud? No problem with entry or release. Look S-Track MTB / cyclocross pedal reviewed. © Cyclocross Magazine

Our first rides involved muddy running, which caked up the sole and cleat, but thanks to the open pedal design, and perhaps the carved-out cleat, engagement required only minimally increased force and release was not greatly affected. Release did not seem to be affected by sticky mud and grass, offering a smooth predictable release every time.

The cleat is designed to evacuate mud, but still collects it. Entry and exit still work just fine. Look S-Track MTB / cyclocross pedal reviewed. © Cyclocross Magazine

The cleat is designed to evacuate mud, but still collects it. Entry and exit still work just fine. Look S-Track MTB / cyclocross pedal reviewed. © Cyclocross Magazine

I practiced high-speed dismounts with the S-Track, at first nervously, but never experienced a problem with release—again, as long as it’s done with intention. Miles later, the engagement is still firm, and the force to enter or release is not perceptibly different.

Float is listed at +/- 3 degrees, or 6 degrees total, with a 15 degree release angle and my measurements indicate that’s pretty accurate.

<< Previous PageNext Page >>

 

 

Cyclocross Magazine, Issue 22, Print and digital subscriptionsHave you subscribed yet? You're missing out if not. Get all-original content and your cyclocross fix throughout the year with a subscription and Issue 23 back copy, with features on Lars van der Haar, Jonathan Page, Elle Anderson and more!
Tagged as: , , ,
16 comments
lineark
lineark

can i use this for a road bike? 

Smith Mann
Smith Mann

An upgrade over ATAC- read the review!

Brandon Rothauge
Brandon Rothauge

Much easier to engage than the ATAC, and they shed mud, sand and grass more efficiently.

craigmacintyre
craigmacintyre

I have two questions.  First, how much release angle - I assume they have some float just by the design.  Second, you infer that the cleat pedal interface is strictly between the cleat and the pedal with the shoe essentially taken out of the equation - is that right?  If so these may just become a bike fitters dream pedal (for shimming and wedging!)

Sean Wittmer
Sean Wittmer

It might just be me but the retention system looks very TIME like.

repsteindds
repsteindds

Uh yeah, okay. Time, the other French company got it right a long time ago. I will stick with my ATAC's which have changed very little in my 20 years on them.

ChrisFallon
ChrisFallon

Overall an excellent review of the pedals. I wondered with the one caveat being ease of entry why you did not mention the easy cleat vs. the comp cleat choice the pedals come with? 

Pablo Thai
Pablo Thai

I love them.. They have more platform support then the egg beater from crank brother..but both are great pedals.

SmithMann
SmithMann

@craigmacintyre I checked the release angle and find it closely matches the advertised of 15 degrees.  We rode the S-Track with the standard included cleats without the optionally available composite cages, so indeed your statement is true.  The shoe treads never contact the pedal, the interface is cleat to pedal only.  With the cages, that will likely change.  I've spoken to a pro bike fitter local to me about this and he began using the S-Track as his recommended mtb pedal soon after it came out  for this very reason.

SmithMann
SmithMann

@ChrisFallon Thanks for the comment. You're a well-informed reader and while we were doing this long-term review, we didn't even notice the new cleat was released this summer. I'll be putting the Easy Cleat option for a run (literally) in the next couple of weeks and will add to the review with an update.  

Stay up to date:

Search for a product, review, race or racer:

Visit these cx-loving companies:





Support CXM at no extra cost to you: